Kantz v. Elkhart County Highway Department
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STATON, Judge.
Annie and James Kantz appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Elkhart County Highway Department (the “County”). The Kantzes raise three issues on appeal which we restate as two:
I. Whether the County owed Mrs. Kantz a duty to remove a tree stump located on the right-of-way of a county road.
II. Whether Mr. Kantz’s claim is barred by the Indiana Tort Claims Act because he did not file a tort claims notice within 180 days of the accident, instead filing his complaint within 180 days.
We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. 1
The facts most…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Stephenson v. LedbetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Mullin v. Municipal City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Goldsberry v. GrubbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Reed v. LuznyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Benton v. City of Oakland CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Brown v. AlexanderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ousley v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF FULTON CTY.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Del Vecchio v. Conseco, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Alexander v. City of South BendDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.