Legal Opinion

Tibbs v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1996No. 32S01-9505-CV-00603PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeBRULER, Justice.

This case is before the Court on petition to transfer. Ind. Appellate R. 11(B)(@Z)(a). Appellant Roy Tibbs challenges a grant of summary judgment for appellees Grunau Company, Inc. (Grunau) and Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. (HHN). In an unpublished opinion, the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court. Tibbs v. Huber, Hunt & Nichois, Inc., 646 N.E.2d 1016 (Ind.Ct.App.1995) (Mem.). We granted transfer to address a single issue: whether Grunau owed a duty of care towards Tibbs.

Appellant Roy W. Tibbs was an engineer employed by the State of Indiana. Grunau was a mechanical…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Miller v. GrieselIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hammond v. AllegrettiIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Rediehs Express, Inc. v. MapleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Monroe Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Magwerks Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Goldsberry v. GrubbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Indiana University Medical Center, Riley Hospital for Children v. LoganIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Butler v. City of PeruIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API