Legal Opinion

Shanahan v. District Memorial Hospital

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 23, 1993No. C8-92-1564PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

After her employment with respondent District Memorial Hospital was terminated, relator Cheryl A. Shanahan filed a claim with the Department of Jobs and Training for unemployment benefits. A claims adjudicator determined that she was ineligible for benefits and, after a hearing, a referee affirmed. Shanahan appealed to respondent Commissioner of Jobs and Training and a Commissioner’s representative affirmed. By writ of certiorari, Shanahan appeals the Commissioner's representative’s decision. We affirm.

FACTS

Shanahan worked as a chemical dependency counselor at…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Ferguson v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Porrazzo v. Nabisco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Seacrist v. City of Cottage GroveCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hayes v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Brula v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Brula v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Brula v. St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Hampton v. KohlerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API