Legal Opinion

R.A.P. v. B.J.P.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 9, 1988No. C8-88-524PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

Appellant R.A.P. brought an action against his former wife, respondent B.J.P., alleging that she negligently, intentionally, and fraudulently infected him with genital herpes. R.A.P., also asserts that B.J.P. fraudulently induced him to marry her by making false representations about her family background and upbringing.

The trial court granted summary judgment for B.J.P., and R.A.P. appeals. We reverse in part and remand the case because we conclude that R.A.P. has potential causes of action against B.J.P. for negligent and fraudulent transmission of genital herpes.

FACTS

B.J…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. SjogrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Ellis v. Minneapolis Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Behr v. RedmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Doe v. DillingIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. R.W. v. T.F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API