Legal Opinion

Doe v. Dilling

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2008No. 104049PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Fitzgerald, Gar-man, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Kilbride specially concurred, with opinion.

Justice Burke took no part in the decision.

OPINION

Plaintiff, Jane Doe, filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook County against defendants Elizabeth and Kirkpatrick Dilling, for, inter alia, fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation. A jury found for Doe on the fraudulent misrepresentation claim and awarded her $2 million in compensatory damages. The appellate court vacated the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict finding…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Soules v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Charles Hester Enterprises, Inc. v. Illinois Founders InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Sophie Toulon v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Doe-3 v. McLean County Unit District No. 5 Board of DirectorsIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Margery Newman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Newton Tractor Sales, Inc. v. Kubota Tractor Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Lewis v. Lead Industries Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 2020

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API