Griess v. State Investment & Insurance
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco denying a motion to dismiss a motion for a new trial, and from an order denying a motion to correct the minutes of the court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
The State Investment and Insurance Company executed to plaintiff Griess a policy insuring him against loss from fire of property therein described in the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars, of which amount fifteen hundred dollars was to be paid to *412defendant Meyer. The loss occurred, and plaintiff brought suit upon the policy to recover the amount thereby agreed to be paid, and as defendant Meyer would not join as a plaintiff, he was made a defendant, so that his interest therein might be determined. Both defendants answered, the insurance company denying its liability, and the defendant…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Imperial Beverage Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lake v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.