Legal Opinion
Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 14, 1952No. Civ. No. 7990PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, District Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this action seeking a declaratory judgment to the effect that the “Hook & Miller” boiler embodies none of the inventions covered by Patent No. 2247796 and that therefore that patent is not being infringed by them. After numerous proceedings in this matter, the plaintiffs filed a petition on July 31, 1951, asking this Court to enjoin the “defendant Hook & Ackerman, Inc. from prosecuting the suits which it has brought against plaintiffs’ customers, and any that it may hereafter bring, pending final decision in this case”. The suits referred to are four…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cresta Blanca Wine Co. v. Eastern Wine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- International Nickel Co. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, Doing Business as a Partnership Under the Name and Style of Hook & Miller v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953