Legal Opinion

International Nickel Co. v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 8, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

The International Nickel Company, Inc., on August 14, 1952 initiated an action in this court against the Ford Motor Company and Caswell Motor Company, Inc., a dealer in Ford products, charging that the defendants “ * * * are now manufacturing, using and/or selling articles * * ” which infringe plaintiff’s patent Number 2,485,760. (Paragraph 7 of the complaint.) The prayer asks for judgment holding said letters patent valid, enjoining defendants from using or causing to be used articles embodying the inventions covered by this patent and for an accounting and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Michael Meeropol and Robert Meeropol v. Louis Nizer and Doubleday & Co., Inc., and Fawcett Publications, Inc., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. International Nickel Co., Inc. v. Martin J. Barry, IncCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
  3. Audio Devices, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
  4. Hamilton Watch Co. v. Read Drug & Chemical Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API