Legal Opinion
Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 12, 1954No. 11237PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The litigation dealt with in this opinion began with a complaint filed on July 19, 1949 in the court below. 1 The plaintiffs, C. Howard Hook and W. W. Miller, individually and doing business as a partnership under the name and style of Hook & Miller, hereinafter referred to as “Hook & Miller”, sued the defendant, Hook & Ackerman, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Hook & Ackerman”, seeking a judgment declaring that the Hook & Miller boiler embodied none of the inventions covered by Hook & Ackerman’s United States Patent No. 2,247,796 and that therefore the claims of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Musher Foundation, Inc. v. Alba Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Morgenstern Chemical Co., Inc. v. Schering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Jaffee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Leon F. Urbain and Loxit Systems, Inc. v. Knapp Brothers Manufacturing Company, Al Levinson, Charles Levinson, and Robert LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Chappell & Co., Inc., T. B. Harms Company, Williamson Music, Inc., Frank Loesser and Frank Music Corp. v. J. Jay FrankelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Elizabeth Nye Woodard, Miles Cogley Nye, Jr., and the Kendall Company v. Sage Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Cromaglass Corporation, Williamsport, Pa. (A Pennsylvania Corporation) v. Carl FermCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.