Cash v. Maddox
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
John and Sue Maddox allegedly contracted to sell Morris and Betty Cash 15 acres of land. The trial court held there was a binding contract and ordered specific performance. The Maddoxes, appellants, contend the memorandum of the alleged contract of sale is too vague and indefinite to satisfy the Statute of Frauds. We agree and reverse the lower court.
Appellants and respondents are husband and wife respectively. The Cashes lived in Florida. They telephoned the' Maddoxes who lived in Georgia, and discussed the purchase of 15 acres of land owned by the Maddoxes. The only written…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McMillan v. McMillanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Speed v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Haygood v. DuncanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Aust v. BeardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Jackson v. FrierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gagne v. StevensSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Springob v. University of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Lewis v. Finetex, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Cousar v. Shepherd-Will, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Fici v. KoonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.