Legal Opinion

Haygood v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 13, 1948No. 16371PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Candler, Justice.

The only question presented for decision by the writ of error is whether or not a contract for the sale of land sufficiently described the property which the maker intended to include therein. On this issue the court directed the jury to return a verdict finding that the contract was void for want of description. The exception here is to a judgment overruling a motion for new trial, which complained only of the verdict as directed. As to this question the record shows: The defendant Haygood relied upon a deed, dated August 13, 1917, from W. W. Duncan to Mrs. Julia A. White,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moore v. McAfeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Andrews v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  3. King v. BriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Blumberg v. NathanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Deaton v. SwansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Bowles v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. Scott v. LesterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  4. Daniel Mill, LLC v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Lankford v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API