Jackson v. Frier
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Mauldin, J., Aiken, March, 1921. Action by D. A. Jackson against W. F. Frier. From directed verdict for plaintiff the defendant appeals.
Read the full summary
Before Mauldin, J., Aiken, March, 1921. Action by D. A. Jackson against W. F. Frier. From directed verdict for plaintiff the defendant appeals. The plaintiff testified that he did not deliver the automobile to defendant -as part payment on land as claimed by defendant; that he had not agreed to buy the land, but that he merely permitted the defendant to use the automobile, with the understanding that, if it suited him, and the plaintiff agreed to buy the land, the defendant was to allow plaintiff specified amount on the land in return for the automobile. His testimony was corroborated by his…
1Opinion of the Court
February 27, 1922. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is an action in claim and delivery. The plaintiff brought his action against the defendant for an automobile. The defendant claimed that he agreed to sell the plaintiff a tract of land, and that the plaintiff turned over to him the automobile in question in part payment for the land. It was admitted that the contract was by parol. The plaintiff denied that he had made the contract, and that he had only loaned the automobile to the defendant. The trial Judge directed a verdict for the plaintiff on the question of ownership, and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Speed v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Jackson v. FrierSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Lanham v. ReimannOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Cash v. MaddoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Fici v. KoonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.