Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Steele
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom the Monroe Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, C. J.
This cause originated before the mayor of the city of Bloomington, where the appellee recovered $49.35, which was the exact amount sued for in his complaint. The appellant appealed to the Circuit Court, where the cause was tried de novo, and the appellee, without having amended his complaint, recovered $51.
The first question we are to decide is that raised by the appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
The statute allows an appeal only in such cases when the amount in controversy, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeds $50. Section 632, R. S. 1881. There was no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex parte SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Krutz v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Buchanan v. State ex rel. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Sandford Tool & Fork Co. v. MullenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Leib v. ButterickIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HeathIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Keck v. State ex rel. National Cash Register Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- Parrill v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. PriddyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Helms v. AppletonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.