Leib v. Butterick
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Elkhart Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.
This was an action by .the appellees, against the appellants. The complaint originally contained two paragraphs, the first for goods sold and delivered, and the second upon an acceptance. There was a third paragraph of complaint afterward added, which will be noticed hereafter. The issues joined were tried by the court, resulting in a finding and judgment for the plaintiffs.
The following are the ei’rors assigned :
*200“ 1st. The court erred in not requiring a more specific-bill of particulars to be filed with the first and third paragraphs of complaint.
“2d. The court erred in permitting ■ the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hay v. State ex rel. McClanrahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Durham v. FechheimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
3Cited by11 opinions
- Levy v. ChittendenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Stanton v. KenrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Adams v. MainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Steinke v. BentleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Child v. SwainIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.