Parrill v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom the Grant Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Black, J. —
The appellants, as partners, sued the appellee, alleging in the complaint that the appellee was a common carrier of goods from Eairmount, in Grant county, Indiana, to Anderson, in Madison county, Indiana; that on the 18th of October, 1897, the appellants .delivered to the appellee certain hogs, sheep, and calves, the number and value of each class being stated, all of the value of $770;, that these animals were to be carried by the appellee from said Eairmount by way of said Anderson to East Buffalo, New York; that they were loaded in a car furnished by the appellee, •having open…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Michaels v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. SherwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Smith v. . the New York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Bartlett v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Flint & Walling Manufacturing Co. v. BeckettIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Hibschman Pontiac, Inc. v. BatchelorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HollowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Kidwell v. Oregon Short Line R.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
- Metropolitan Trust Co. of New York v. Toledo, St. L. & K. C. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.