Ex parte Sweeney
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— The petition of the clerk requires an examination of the act approved February 28th, 1891, creating an Appellate Court.
The petition of the clerk requires an examination of the act approved February 28th, 1891, creating an Appellate-Court.
*585It is so evident that the act recognizes the general and superior appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court that little else is required than the bare statement that the appellate authority not expressly or impliedly vested in the newly created tribunal remains, where the Constitution and the law place it, in the Supreme Court of the State. The act does…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Elgin v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Bank of the United States v. DANIELSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Doctor v. HartmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Chaplin v. Commissioners of HighwaysIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Lee v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Board of Com'rs v. Kokomo City Plan Com'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Benson v. ChristianIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Van Sickle v. BelknapIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Board of Commissioners v. Kokomo City Plan CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Ex parte FranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.