Krutz v. Howard
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Switzerland Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, J.
— Complaint on a promissory note, by the appellee, against the appellants.
Answer, trial, finding, motion for a new trial overruled, judgment, appeal.
Eight assignments’of error are made in this court, only-two of which need to be noticed:
1. The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and,
7. Overruling the motion for a .new trial.
In the complaint the appellants are described as “ William G. Krutz and Henry Krutz, partners trading in the firm name of Wm. G. Krutz & Co., Charles Schmied and Christian Carver,” as defendants. The note is signed, “Wm. G: Krutz &…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Krewson v. CloudIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Krutz v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Hamilton v. WinterrowdIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Witter v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Mershon v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Thorn v. SilverIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Peters v. BantaIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- State ex rel. Egan v. WoleverIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.