Scobell Inc. v. Schade
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
In this consolidated appeal, we are asked to determine whether the record evidence supports an award of damages for lost profits which must be ascertained with reasonable certainty upon a former employee’s breach of a covenant not to compete. We hold that in this case the evidence does not support a portion of the damages awarded by the trial court. Accordingly, we affirm in part and modify in part.
The salient facts and procedural history underlying this appeal are as follows. In August of 1989, Scobell, Inc. (“Scobell”) was in the heating, ventilating, and air conditioning…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Marshall v. Daniel Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Geisinger Clinic v. Di CuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Gemini Equipment Co. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Aiken Industries, Inc. v. Estate of WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Wolfe v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Missett v. Hub International Pennsylvania, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Haywood v. University of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Republic Servs. of Pa., LLC v. Caribbean Operators, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.