Legal Opinion

Rizzo v. Haines

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1989No. 93 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1987PublishedCited by 191 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*489OPINION OF THE COURT

STOUT, Justice.

Barton A. Haines, Esquire, appeals from the order of the Superior Court, 357 Pa.Super. 57, 515 A.2d 321 affirming in part, and reversing and remanding in part, the judgment order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County that held that he negligently, and in bad faith, conducted settlement negotiations for his client Frank L. Rizzo,1 that he had fraudulently induced his client to transfer $50,000 to him, and that he improperly accounted for costs and expenses. The trial court entered a judgment against him in the amount of $530,000 in compensatory…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by191 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Renk v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Hutchison Ex Rel. Hutchison v. LuddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Coulter v. RamsdenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

186 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API