Legal Opinion

Gemini Equipment Co. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 1, 1991No. 00324 and 00369PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from the judgment entered granting appellant possession of the automobile in question but denying appellant the award of special damages. We affirm.

On appeal, appellant, Gemini Equipment Company (“Gemini”) raises the sole issue of whether the lower court erred in denying special damages in a replevin action after having found appellant entitled to possession of an automobile unlawfully detained by Pennsy Supply, Inc. (“Pennsy”). Cross-appellant Pennsy asks this court to consider this same issue as well as the following three questions: (1)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Ecksel v. Orleans Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. McGuire v. Schneider, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. McCormick v. Northeastern BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Hollock v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Sprague v. WalterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. American States Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Turney Media Fuel, Inc. v. Toll Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API