Legal Opinion

Aiken Industries, Inc. v. Estate of Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1978No. 79PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Court being equally divided with respect to the question of appellant’s liability, the decree below is affirmed.

Each party to bear own costs.

JONES, former C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Mr. Justice Pomeroy filed an opinion, joined by Mr. Chief Justice Eagen and Mr. Justice O’Brien, which would affirm the decree below insofar as it finds a breach of the covenant not to compete but would vacate the award insofar as it fixes the amount of damages and would remand for the recalculation of damages. Mr. Justice Roberts, Mr. Justice Nix and Mr.…

3Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Van Products Co. v. General Welding & Fabricating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Jacobson & Co. v. International Environment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Field v. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Piercing Pagoda, Inc. v. HoffnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by61 opinions

  1. Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Atacs Corporation Airtacs Corporation, in 97-1812 v. Trans World Communications, Inc., in 97-1813. Nos. 97-1812, 97-1813Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. Hess v. Gebhard & Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Spang & Co. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API