Legal Opinion

Geisinger Clinic v. Di Cuccio

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 3, 1992No. 253PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge.

This is an appeal from an Order entering a declaratory judgment in favor of Geisinger Clinic (Geisinger) and against Nicholas W. Di Cuccio, M.D., (Dr. Di Cuccio) appellant herein.

Dr. Di Cuccio raises for our consideration four issues: (1) The employment agreement is invalid because its terms are ambiguous and illusory, and, consequently, the restrictive covenant ancillary to the agreement is unenforceable; (2) The liquidated damages clause is an unconscionable forfeiture which renders it an invalid, unenforceable penalty clause; (3) The two year limitation of the restrictive…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. John G. Bryant Co. v. Sling Testing & Repair, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Greene v. Oliver Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Barb-Lee Mobile Frame Co. v. HootSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. Musser Forests, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Lackner v. GlosserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Giordano v. ClaudioDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Pantuso Motors, Inc. v. Corestates BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Weavertown Transport Leasing, Inc. v. MoranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Scobell Inc. v. SchadeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API