Legal Opinion
United States v. Vilhotti
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 16, 1971No. 69 Cr. 560PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TYLER, District Judge.
Four of the above-named defendants, Rudolph Vilhotti, Vincent Santa, Albert Mercurio and Anthony DiMenna, 1 moved for an order pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure directing the suppression and return of certain cartons containing sundry drug items, seized without a warrant by a special agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, William E. Kelly, on March 27, 1969.
In a three-count indictment, filed July 10, 1969, defendants were charged with conspiracy to violate and violations of 18 U.S.C. § 659, in the purchase, receipt and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Lippert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- State v. BroadnaxWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- United States v. John Irving Hillison, United States of America v. Murray David Jacobson, United States of America v. Jeffrey Ketchum MansfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- State v. VonhofCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.