Legal Opinion
State v. Broadnax
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1982No. 47976-3PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Petitioner, Steven Arthur Thompson, was charged with possession of heroin, a violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, RCW 69.50. The trial court judge denied petitioner's motion to suppress the evidence and found him guilty. Petitioner's appeal to the Court of Appeals, Division One, resulted in an affirmance of the conviction by a 2-to-1 vote. State v. Broadnax, 25 Wn. App. 704, 612 P.2d 391 (1980). On October 10, 1980, Department Two of this court considered Thompson's first petition for review and remanded the case "for Decision in light of State v. Hobart [94 Wn.2d 437, 617 P.2d…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. GlaserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.