Legal Opinion

State v. Vonhof

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 7, 1988No. 8320-9-IIIPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

John C. Vonhof, Larry D. Bell, and Donald E. Noll appeal their convictions for manufacturing a controlled substance. They argue the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant issued on the basis of information supplied by a tax appraiser, and also because there was an insufficient basis for the warrant. We affirm.

Brian Royer, an appraiser with the Ferry County assessor's office, entered property owned by Mr. Vonhof and Mr. Bell to revalue the property for tax purposes. To reach the defendants' property, Mr. Royer had to pass through a locked gate.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Matter of MaxfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Kenneth D. Widgren, Jr. And Kenneth D. Widgren, Sr. v. Maple Grove Township H. Wayne Beldo Louis Lenz, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 2000

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API