Legal Opinion

Lippert v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1984No. 023-83PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

ONION, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the possession of a controlled substance, to-wit: methamphetamine, with intent to deliver. After the jury’s verdict of guilty, the court assessed punishment at 10 years’ imprisonment, probated.

On appeal appellant contended the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence obtained in an unlawful search and seizure of his person in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. See also Article I, § 9, Tex. Const. Appellant argued that the search was unconstitutional…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. People v. GlaserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Worthey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Kelly v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
  5. McAllister v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API