Legal Opinion

State v. Seagull

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1981No. 47130-4PublishedCited by 233 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stafford, J. —

Petitioners seek review of a denial of their motion to suppress evidence gathered as a result of an allegedly unconstitutional search and seizure. We affirm.

In the summer of 1977 petitioners Suzzi Seagull and Douglas Gilson lived in an old farmhouse in rural Clallam County. Approximately 20 feet to the west of the house were a chicken coop/pumphouse and a greenhouse. The 10-by 12-foot greenhouse was constructed of two-by-fours covered with light translucent plastic. Between the house and the outbuildings was patchy grass, and, apparently, a worn-down area somewhat adjacent to…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by233 opinions

  1. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. MyrickWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2001

228 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API