Legal Opinion

Berman v. Renart Sportswear Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1963No. Civ. 27537PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

Plaintiff sued appellant, two individuals, and a number of fictitious defendants. His amended complaint alleged, in general, that plaintiff was in partnership with the two individual defendants, that such partnership had an oral agreement with appellant to act as its sales representative for a one year period beginning on October 31, 1962, and that appellant and the two individual defendants had unlawfully excluded plaintiff from the partnership affairs and from the agency.

The first three causes of action are against the alleged copartners only, seeking dissolution of the partnership, an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Posner v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. O'MALLEY v. Wilshire Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Case v. Kadota Fig Ass'n of ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Bertero v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Windsor Mills, Inc. v. Collins & Aikman Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Boys Club of San Fernando Valley, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Westra v. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Pacific Investment Co. v. TownsendCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API