Laymon v. J. Rockcliff, Inc.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtMargulies, Acting P.J.
*815The plaintiffs in these consolidated appeals filed suit against the brokers who represented them in the sale of their homes and a group of companies that provided services in connection with those sales. Plaintiffs contend defendants violated their fiduciary duties by failing to disclose alleged kickbacks paid by the service providers to the brokers in connection with the sales.
Defendants filed motions to compel arbitration of these claims on the basis of three separate agreements, at least one of which was executed by each plaintiff. The trial court found the arbitration clauses in two of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Westra v. Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Rice v. DownsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Co. v. Hock Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Davis v. Fresno Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brockman v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- J.H. Boyd Enterprises, Inc. v. BoydCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Passport Resorts v. Amrisc CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Sierra Pacific Industries Wage and Hour CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- Sierra Pacific Industries Wage and Hour CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026