Legal Opinion
Holland v. Niemi
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1959No. 35011PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.
The trial court sustained a demurrer to the amended complaint and entered judgment of dismissal, with prejudice, upon the ground that the amended complaint did not state a cause of action. Plaintiff appeals. The amended complaint reads as follows:
“Comes now the plaintiff, and for a cause of action against the above-named defendants, complains and alleges:
“(1) That the plaintiff is the duly appointed, qualified and acting Guardian Ad Litem of Bradley Holland, a minor.
“(2) That at all times material herein, the defendants were and now are husband and wife, constituting a marital community under…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Meyer v. General Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Deffland v. Spokane Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Mail v. M. R. Smith Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Anderson v. ReederWashington Supreme Court · 1953
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ochampaugh v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- Haddad v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
- McDermott v. KaczmarekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Daggett v. TiffanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Schneider v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.