Legal Opinion

Holland v. Niemi

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1959No. 35011PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOtt, J.

The trial court sustained a demurrer to the amended complaint and entered judgment of dismissal, with prejudice, upon the ground that the amended complaint did not state a cause of action. Plaintiff appeals. The amended complaint reads as follows:

“Comes now the plaintiff, and for a cause of action against the above-named defendants, complains and alleges:
“(1) That the plaintiff is the duly appointed, qualified and acting Guardian Ad Litem of Bradley Holland, a minor.
“(2) That at all times material herein, the defendants were and now are husband and wife, constituting a marital community under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Meyer v. General Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Deffland v. Spokane Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Mail v. M. R. Smith Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Anderson v. ReederWashington Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ochampaugh v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Haddad v. First National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  3. McDermott v. KaczmarekCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. Daggett v. TiffanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Schneider v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API