Legal Opinion

Atwell v. City of Rohnert Park

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided September 18, 2018No. A151896, A153011PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMargulies, J.

Appellants Nancy Atwell, Elizabeth Craven, and Matthew Weinstein appeal the denial of their petition for writ of mandate against the City of Rohnert Park (City). In 2010 and 2015, the city council approved and reapproved an expansion for an existing Wal-Mart store, which would include a full grocery component. Appellants contend the city council's second approval was inconsistent with its General Plan and land use policy LU-7. The trial court concluded appellants' petition was barred by res judicata because a prior petition challenging the city council's initial approval also asserted a claim…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People Ex Rel. Harris v. Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Federation of Hillside & Canyon Associations v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
  2. Friends of Gualala River v. Gualala Redwood Timber, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  3. Glaude v. Deutsche BankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
  4. Gomes v. Mendocino City Community Services Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Mark Terrence Andrews v. Robert H. Pittman, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API