Legal Opinion

Gomes v. Mendocino City Community Services Dist.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 2025No. A167862Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 4/14/25 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE STEVEN L. GOMES, Plaintiff and Respondent, A167862 v. MENDOCINO CITY COMMUNITY (Mendocino County SERVICES DISTRICT, Super. Ct. No. 21CV00177) Defendant and Appellant. Steven Gomes filed the underlying action to invalidate ordinances that regulate groundwater use in the unincorporated town of Mendocino. The ordinances were adopted by the Mendocino City Community Services District (the district), which has been authorized by the Legislature to manage the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Mycogen Corp. v. Monsanto Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API