Legal Opinion

Vanlandingham v. Jenkins

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1949No. 37324PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The appellee, W. A. Jenkins, was the owner of a house and lot in the City of Clarksdale, which he turned over to Holcomb and Longino, Inc., Real Estate Agents, for sale. He did so under what is known as an agency contract, a part of which was as follows: ‘ ‘ The title is good and abstract of title and taxes will be furnished at my expense.” Thereafter Charles Longino, Jr., of the real estate firm, contacted H. C. Vanlandingham and Ernest Vanlandingham, who are brothers, ■ and as a result thereof an agreement was reached between them. Under it, the Vanlandinghams were to buy Jenkins’ property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gregg v. Von PhulSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Shaw v. ShawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
  3. Philbrook v. BelknapSupreme Court of Vermont · 1834
  4. Moak v. BryantMississippi Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dew v. LangfordMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bishop Ryan High School v. LindbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Gunn v. HegginsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
  4. Houston v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2009
  5. Patrick Petroleum Corporation of Michigan v. Callon Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API