Union & Planters' Bank & Trust Co. v. Corley
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
On the Plea in Bar.
2Opinion of the Court · EthridgeEthridge, P. J.
There was a suit by the Union & Planters’ Bank & Trust Company against W. D. Corley to enforce by a specific performance a contract of sale of certain lands. It appears that in the contract sought to be specifically enforced there was a provision for payment of rent in case the contract of sale was not carried out. On the trial below the court held that there was no right to a specific performance of the contract, because a deed was hot tendered showing a merchantable title during the year 1927, and the court decreed rent in accordance with the stipulation of the contract…
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ferrara v. WaltersMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Jones v. HicksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
- Gunn v. HegginsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
- Brent v. CorbinMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
- Presley v. HaynesMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.