Legal Opinion

Hill v. Bridgers

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 8, 1981No. 80-1190PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHEB, Chief Judge.

William H. Hill and Mary L. Hill challenge the trial court’s judgment that W. R. Bridgers and Maxine Bridgers, as sellers, were entitled to retain the earnest money the Hills had deposited under a contract to purchase residential real property. We reverse.

In September 1978 the Hills and Bridgers executed a contract prepared by Owler Realty for the purchase of residential real property owned by the Bridgers, and the Hills deposited earnest money which Owler Realty held. The contract, the basic form of which both the Florida Bar and Florida Association of Realtors have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. P & N INVESTMENT CORP. v. Florida Ranchettes, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Brent v. CorbinMississippi Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Noblin v. Harbor Hills Development, L.P.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API