Ortiz v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORSEY, Justice.
This appeal involves the trial judge accepting a plea of guilty pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, but later rejecting the agreement. The principal issue is whether jeopardy attaches, so as to bar a subsequent prosecution, when the judge announces he accepts a plea of guilty pursuant to a plea bargain agreement and later, when punishment is to be assessed, rejects the earlier plea and allows it to be withdrawn. We hold a subsequent prosecution is not barred; however, we reform the judgment on other grounds and, as reformed, affirm.
Appellant pled nolo contendere to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- State v. TorresCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Clifton Fransaw v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
- Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Dorsey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- Zinn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.