Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided November 17, 1994No. 13-91-607-CRPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

This appeal involves the trial judge accepting a plea of guilty pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, but later rejecting the agreement. The principal issue is whether jeopardy attaches, so as to bar a subsequent prosecution, when the judge announces he accepts a plea of guilty pursuant to a plea bargain agreement and later, when punishment is to be assessed, rejects the earlier plea and allows it to be withdrawn. We hold a subsequent prosecution is not barred; however, we reform the judgment on other grounds and, as reformed, affirm.

Appellant pled nolo contendere to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. EvansCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. State v. TorresCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Clifton Fransaw v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  2. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Dorsey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  4. Ramirez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  5. Zinn v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API