Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 25, 1996No. 002-95PublishedCited by 148 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

KELLER, Judge.

The issues presented in this case are whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that jeopardy attaches in a guilty plea proceeding when the trial court accepts the plea agreement and whether the Court of Appeals correctly found that the trial court had not accepted the plea agreement when it accepted the guilty plea.

Appellant was indicted for aggravated robbery. On July 28, 1989, in accord with a plea agreement, Appellant pled guilty to the lesser included offense of robbery with no agreement as to punishment. The trial…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Ricketts v. AdamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by148 opinions

  1. Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  2. York v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. State v. MooreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. Ditto v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

143 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API