Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Army

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided July 29, 1981No. CM 438532PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The appellant was convicted of a number of offenses relating to blackmarketing activities while a member of the 2d Infantry Division in the Republic of Korea. He was sentenced to be dismissed from the service and to pay a fine of $10,000.00. Before us, he raises several assignments of error, four of which merit discussion.

*909I

The appellant urges the Court to set aside the findings as to Specifications 1 and 3, Charge I because the trial judge erroneously instructed the court that solicitation under Article 134 requires only a general intent as opposed to a specific intent.…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. DeainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. CarpenterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. TangpuzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  5. United States v. LucasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. DavenportU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. BrownU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. DyerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. United States v. InghamU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API