Legal Opinion
United States v. Dyer
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
Decided May 6, 1986No. CM 441944PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR NEW TRIAL
FELDER, Judge:
Appellant pleaded not guilty but was convicted of various sex-related offenses by a general court-martial in October 1981. This court granted appellant’s petition for a new trial because of misbehavior by a government psychiatric witness. United States v. Dyer, 16 M.J. 894 (A.C.M.R.1983). Notwithstanding extensive evidence of his lack of mental responsibility, appellant was again convicted in March 1984 by court members of essentially the same charges and sentenced to confinement at hard labor *580for four years and partial…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8MM. FilmSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. HullettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. MaxwellUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. GalloUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. Specialist KRISTOPHER M. HADLEYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017