Legal Opinion

United States v. Ingham

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 26, 1993No. ACMR 9002347PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CREAN, Senior Judge:

The appellant was found guilty, on mixed pleas, by a general court-martial composed of officer members, of sodomy with a child under the age of sixteen by force and without consent (three specifications), indecent acts or liberties with a child under the age of sixteen (three specifications), indecent assault, adultery, disobeying an order by a superior commissioned officer, and breaking arrest (two specifications), in violation of Articles 90, 95, 125, and 134, 10 U.S.C. §§ 890, 895, 925, and 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The appellant pled not guilty…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. InghamCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  2. United States v. LewisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. RodriguezNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  4. Ingham v. TilleryDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  5. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API