United States v. Ingham
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CREAN, Senior Judge:
The appellant was found guilty, on mixed pleas, by a general court-martial composed of officer members, of sodomy with a child under the age of sixteen by force and without consent (three specifications), indecent acts or liberties with a child under the age of sixteen (three specifications), indecent assault, adultery, disobeying an order by a superior commissioned officer, and breaking arrest (two specifications), in violation of Articles 90, 95, 125, and 134, 10 U.S.C. §§ 890, 895, 925, and 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The appellant pled not guilty…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. InghamCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. LewisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. RodriguezNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- Ingham v. TilleryDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995