Legal Opinion
Delaware & Hudson Railway Co. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 2, 1987No. 86-CV-810PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McCURN, District Judge.
This treble-damage antitrust action is brought pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 15. The plaintiff, Delaware and Hudson Railway Company (“D & H”), asserts that it has been injured by actions of the defendant, Consolidated Railway Company (“Conrail”), in contravention of Section two of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, which forbids a person or company to “monopolize, or attempt to monopolize ... any part of the trade or commerce among the several States.” Id. Pending before the court is a motion by Conrail to dismiss the complaint pursuant to F.R.C.P.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Delaware & Hudson Railway Company v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- State Ex Rel. Bell Atlantic-West Virginia, Inc. v. RansonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
- Allen v. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2010
- New York Cross Harbor Railroad Terminal Corp. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.