Legal Opinion
Delaware & Hudson Railway Company v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 20, 1990No. 1123, Docket 89-9034PublishedCited by 519 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Delaware & Hudson Railway Co. (“D & H”) appeals from a summary judgment entered November 20, 1989 in the Northern District of New York, Neal P. McCurn, Chief Judge, in favor of appellant Consolidated Rail Corp. (“Conrail”) in this antitrust action. 724 F.Supp. 1073 (N.D.N.Y.1989).
The district court found that D & H failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact with respect to any of its three claims, viz. monopolization, denial of an “essential facility” and attempted monopolization. On appeal, D & H asserts as error the district court’s rejection of each…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by519 opinions
- Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Josef Fischl v. David Armitage, Corrections Sergeant, and S.A. Marshall, Corrections Officer, in Their Individual CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- New York Ex Rel. Schneiderman v. Actavis PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Kruger v. Virgin Atlantic Airways, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- George Lombard and Lomar, Inc. v. Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc. ("Bah"), and W. Frank Jones, Individually and as an Employee of BahCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
514 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.