Legal Opinion
Deltakeeper v. Oakdale Irrigation District
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 26, 2001No. C035745PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, J.
Plaintiffs Deltakeeper, San Joaquin Audubon Society, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, and the Sierra Club (collectively plaintiffs) appeal from an order granting a motion to dismiss the action for failure to join indispensable parties. (Code Civ. Proc., § 389, subd. (b).)
The named defendants, Oakdale Irrigation District (Oakdale), South San Joaquin Irrigation District (South San Joaquin) and Stockton East Water District (Stockton East), entered into the joint district water purchase agreement (the Agreement), together with the City of Stockton (City), Lincoln…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- County of Imperial v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Citizens for Amending Proposition v. City of Pomona, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- TG Oceanside, L.P. v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Riverwatch v. Olivenhain Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Friends of Shingle Springs Interchange, Inc. v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.