Legal Opinion
Cunningham v. Day Bros. Engineering Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 30, 1947No. 522PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
Appellee sued appellant and one Wilson on a contract covering the installation of a new water service in premises owned by appellant but leased by Wilson. Judgment was given against both defendants but only Cunningham has appealed.
The issue on appeal centers entirely around alleged agreements, one oral and one written, concerning who would pay for the work which admittedly was performed by the appellee corporation. The total amount claimed was $226.60, made up of $205 for labor and materials furnished by appellee plus certain street repair work. There was received in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sigua Iron Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- American Crystal Sugar Co. v. NicholasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Patterson v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Indianapolis Glove Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Spund v. Cafritz Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alberts v. HCA Inc. (In Re Greater Southeast Community Hospital Corp. I)District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Bainum v. WursterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958