Legal Opinion
Spund v. Cafritz Const. Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 6, 1931No. 5079PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
An appeal from a judgment entered against appellant in an action brought by appellee to recover upon an alleged contract for the payment of money.
The appellee, the Cafritz Construction Company, as plaintiff below, filed a declaration alleging that it was a licensed real estate broker in the District of Columbia and as such negotiated a sale of certain described real estate to the defendant, Jacob Spund, at and for the price of $30,500; that defendant then agreed to pay plaintiff the sum of 5 per cent, upon the purchase price, to wit, the sum of $1,525, as a broker’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McMaster v. . Pres., Etc., Ins. Co. of N. Am.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Sigua Iron Co. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- Lowell Manufacturing Co. v. Safeguard Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
3Cited by5 opinions
- Krupsaw v. W. T. Cowan, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Frank A. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
- Cunningham v. Day Bros. Engineering Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Bainum v. WursterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Waltemeyer v. StognerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954