Legal Opinion

Bainum v. Wurster

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1958No. 2100PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellees sued appellant, a real estate broker, to recover a deposit they had placed with him under the terms of a contract for the purchase of real estate by appellees. The vendor was not made a party to the action.

Appellees’ contract was to purchase the property from a Mrs. Fegan at a price of $13,850, with a down payment of $3,500. With respect to the balance the contract provided that appellees would “secure” a first deed of trust of “$10,000 or high as obtainable,” and the remaining balance would be secured by a second deed of trust.

Appellees’ testimony was that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gauss v. KirkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Spund v. Cafritz Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
  3. Eiland v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Cunningham v. Day Bros. Engineering Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Waltemeyer v. StognerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shannon & Luchs Co. v. JeterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API