Legal Opinion
Foland v. Jackson County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 26, 2007No. 2006206, 2006211; A135937PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
The Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) reversed a decision of Jackson County to approve a preliminary development plan for a destination resort. The applicants for that preliminary development plan seek judicial review of LUBA’s final order and opinion, arguing that LUBA failed to adequately defer to the county’s interpretation of its own land development ordinance. We affirm.
The relevant facts are not in dispute. The county has adopted an approval process for destination resort developments. The process consists of three stages. The first stage is the conceptual site plan (CSP), and it…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Foland v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Keizer v. Lake Labish Water Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Oregon CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
3Cited by11 opinions
- Siporen v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Western Land & Cattle, Inc. v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Setniker v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Mark Latham Excavation, Inc. v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Siporen v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.