Legal Opinion
Setniker v. Polk County
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 3, 2011No. 2010057; A148070PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
CPM Development Corporation seeks to develop a sand-and-gravel operation on property adjacent to farmland owned by petitioners in Polk County. In pursuing that development, CPM submitted a three-part application to the county, and the county approved it. Petitioners appealed the county’s decision to LUBA. LUBA rejected most of petitioners’ assignments of error but remanded to the county on others. Rickreall Community Water Assoc. v. Polk County, 53 Or LUBA 76 (2006) (Rickreall I). Petitioners sought judicial review, and we affirmed without an opinion. Rickreall Community Water Assoc. v. Polk…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Siporen v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Western Land & Cattle, Inc. v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Foland v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Mark Latham Excavation, Inc. v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Friends of the Hood River Waterfront v. City of Hood RiverCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Kaplowitz v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Botts Marsh LLC v. City of WheelerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.