Siporen v. City of Medford
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Respondent City of Medford (the city) and intervenor-respondent Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart) seek judicial review of an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) in which LUBA remanded the city’s decision to approve a site development plan without requiring a more comprehensive traffic impact analysis than the one Wal-Mart provided. ORS 197.850(1). On judicial review, the legal issue is whether LUBA, pursuant to ORS 197.829, was required to affirm the city’s interpretation that its code does not require a more comprehensive traffic impact analysis under these circumstances. Because we…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Western Land & Cattle, Inc. v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Foland v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Siporen v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Columbia Riverkeeper v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Devin Oil Co., Inc. v. Morrow CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Hoffman v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Columbia Riverkeeper v. Clatsop CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.