Legal Opinion

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Oregon City

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 15, 2006No. 2004-124; A129946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Petitioners, City of Oregon City and Hilltop Properties, LLC, seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) opinion remanding a decision by the Oregon City Commission (commission) denying an application by respondent, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart), to construct a retail facility within the city limits. LUBA’s recitation of the basic facts are not disputed; we therefore include those facts below:

“The subject property is a 12.87-acre parcel zoned General Commercial in the City of Oregon City. [Wal-Mart] seeks to develop a 147,048-square foot commercial retail development, a Wal-Mart…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Church v. Grant CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foland v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Siporen v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Reinert v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API