Legal Opinion
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. City of Oregon City
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 15, 2006No. 2004-124; A129946PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Petitioners, City of Oregon City and Hilltop Properties, LLC, seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) opinion remanding a decision by the Oregon City Commission (commission) denying an application by respondent, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart), to construct a retail facility within the city limits. LUBA’s recitation of the basic facts are not disputed; we therefore include those facts below:
“The subject property is a 12.87-acre parcel zoned General Commercial in the City of Oregon City. [Wal-Mart] seeks to develop a 147,048-square foot commercial retail development, a Wal-Mart…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Gage v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Church v. Grant CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Foland v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Siporen v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Reinert v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017